In most car accident cases, the exact cause of the wreck is a point of contention. While you might believe that the defendant is clearly to blame, he or she will likely point the finger at you or someone else. Eyewitness testimony can be a powerful tool to get to the truth, but sometimes you might need something a little more convincing: science.
The importance of accident reconstruction
Accident reconstruction is the process whereby the laws of engineering and physics are utilized in conjunction with evidence, including tire marks and witness testimony, to determine the true cause of an crash. Precise calculations are made and software programs are often utilized to recreate how the accident likely occurred, helping paint a picture for the judge and jury. Those who conduct these evaluations need to be knowledgeable in many areas, including the dynamics of the particular vehicles involved. As such, an accident reconstruction report can be persuasive when trying to negotiate resolution or convince a jury to side with you.
It’s not uncommon for both sides of a personal injury case to have an accident reconstruction expert testify on its behalf. These views are usually competing, too. Therefore, you not only have to know how to competently present your accident reconstruction evidence, but you also have to know how to aggressively challenge the other side’s report. Failing to adequately do so can have tremendous ramifications for your case.
Utilize the resources at your disposal
If you’ve been injured in an accident, then you need to be able to present a strong case if you hope to recover compensation for your damages. To do that, you need to be able to effectively use the tools you have. Whether it’s lay or expert testimony, scientific reports, or a defendant who isn’t convincing on the stand, an attorney who is experienced in personal injury law can help you compellingly make your case. Hopefully then you’ll be able to achieve the outcome you deserve.